<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flash window mode and accessibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lessfussdesign.com/blog/2009/03/wmode-accessibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lessfussdesign.com/blog/2009/03/wmode-accessibility/</link>
	<description>News &#38; web design articles from Andy Bryant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:57:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Bryant</title>
		<link>http://www.lessfussdesign.com/blog/2009/03/wmode-accessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-2364</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Bryant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 07:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lessfussdesign.com/blog/?p=51#comment-2364</guid>
		<description>@Chris A while ago I posted on the Accessify Forum about having the alternative HTML on the page but hidden off-screen, so at least screen reader users unaware of the Flash can still get the content . Nobody&#039;s replied to that yet. Here&#039;s the idea I had:

http://www.accessifyforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=13415

One possible issue is that Google considers duplication of content as black hat, and since Google now indexes Flash content it may take a dim view on a page that has both Flash and HTML content indexable.

I&#039;m continuing to investigate...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris A while ago I posted on the Accessify Forum about having the alternative HTML on the page but hidden off-screen, so at least screen reader users unaware of the Flash can still get the content . Nobody&#8217;s replied to that yet. Here&#8217;s the idea I had:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.accessifyforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=13415" rel="nofollow">http://www.accessifyforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=13415</a></p>
<p>One possible issue is that Google considers duplication of content as black hat, and since Google now indexes Flash content it may take a dim view on a page that has both Flash and HTML content indexable.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m continuing to investigate&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Blouch</title>
		<link>http://www.lessfussdesign.com/blog/2009/03/wmode-accessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-2315</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Blouch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lessfussdesign.com/blog/?p=51#comment-2315</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m struggling with this same issue where DHTML pulldown menus or fake modal dialogues go under a flash video. But if I set wmode to anything other than the default the flash becomes inaccessible to screen readers. Seems like a catch-22 where I can&#039;t make it work well for all users. Is there a solution?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m struggling with this same issue where DHTML pulldown menus or fake modal dialogues go under a flash video. But if I set wmode to anything other than the default the flash becomes inaccessible to screen readers. Seems like a catch-22 where I can&#8217;t make it work well for all users. Is there a solution?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
